1
2
3
Microplastics are very small (generally less than 5 millimeters in size) plastic particles that can originate from a variety of sources, such as ingredients in cigarette filters, textile fibers and cleaning or personal care products, and dust from car and truck tires, as well as from larger plastic products broken down by the effects of the sun, wind and ocean waves.
You may hear the terms “primary” and “secondary” microplastics. Primary microplastics are manufactured to be tiny in order to serve a specific function — for example, as an abrasive in a consumer product. Secondary microplastics come from the breakdown of larger plastic items.
Research has indeed found microplastics in fish and other marine life, and additional studies are underway. But according to a January 2019 report published by SAPEA, a consortium of more than 100 science academies across Europe, the existing evidence does not show that the presence of microplastics causes harm to aquatic organisms. As the scientist who led the study stated:
Although some laboratory studies have found a health impact on marine life such as scallops and mussels after exposing them to high levels of microplastic particles, the report notes that the animals would not be exposed to such high concentrations of microplastics in the wild.
Even studies on animals in the wild must be looked at closely for what they do—and do not—conclude.
For example, researchers at the University of Exeter examined the digestive tracts of 50 deceased sea mammals found on beaches. They found evidence of microplastics in all the animals, but the causes of their deaths remain unknown. The study’s co-author said, “…the [microplastics] levels are low and we don’t yet know what effect, if any, these particles may be having on the individuals.”
The authors of the SAPEA report discussed above concluded that “we have no evidence of widespread risk to human health from NMPs [nano- and microplastics] at present.” Similarly, reports from the Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) agree that—although it is evident that humans are exposed to some level of microplastics through the consumption of seafoods and sea salt—research does not support the theory that microplastics affect human health or that eating seafood presents a human health risk.
You may also have heard that microplastics have been found in drinking water. The SAPEA report states, “the quality of studies that detected [microplastics] in…drinking water is limited, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions.
Collectively, this means that we have no full and balanced view about the occurrence of microplastics in food and drinking water…” As a result, “there is insufficient data to assess exposure for humans, let alone to assess the human health risks of [microplastics] in drinking water and food.”
Organizations worldwide, including those who produced the reports or studies above, are calling for steps to reduce microplastic marine waste and more scientific research to help us understand microplastics. The plastics industry actively supports these goals.
Plastics don’t belong in the ocean or waterways. That’s why the industry is investing in recycling and new recovery technologies and helping people learn to recycle so that every product is put to its highest and best use.